Random Places

Still trying to make something up
Header

CPSC 430 – Journal Entry #3: Not-so-private eyes are watching you

Report the suspicious, not the strange

Don't be alarmed by the invisible man, photographers are the real terrorist

Two months ago, a man was attacked at the Surrey Central station. Though the assault itself is newsworthy, what caught my attention was that it happened inside the so-called “Designated Waiting Area”, supposedly the safest area at a Skytrain station due to the abundance of CCTVs and emergency phone. It wasn’t until the victim used the phone to call that help arrived however.[1] If there’s anything that would justify more security personnel monitoring more security cameras, this would be it. According to Translink spokeperson, Ken Hardie, they just can’t afford more personnel. A similar situation is happening in London, UK
A bomb won't go off here because weeks before a shopper reported someone studying the CCTV cameras

A bomb won't go off here because a photographer was arrested

(possibly the one city in the world with more CCTV than there are people on the street), London’s top policeman believes no more cameras should be installed as not all the data are being processed. Perhaps they can both outsource their surveillance to a new service called Internet Eyes, where the website members are rewarded for reporting suspicious behaviour on their assigned cameras.[2] After all, in accordance with open source ideology, more scrutinizing eyes equals better security, especially since the number of photographers terrorists these days grows exponentially. Alternatively, they can wait for a developing technology where the CCTV systems can automatically spot suspicious activities, thus minimizing human error and bias.[3] Let’s see what kind of behaviour is considered possibly criminal:

  • Moving seats
  • Groups of young men
  • People falling
  • Loitering in stairwell

My gods, I can’t believe how much crime I could’ve prevented if I’d only watched for such tell-tale signs.



[1] Peter Grainger. MLA calls for more security after SkyTrain assault. CTV. Retrieved October 7, 2009, from
http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20090726/bc_skytrain_security_090726/20090726/?hub=BritishColumbiaHome.

[2] Chris Williams. CCTV website recruits video vigilantes. The Register. Retrieved October 7, 2009, from
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/05/internet_eyes/.

[3] Dominic Casciani. Bus CCTV could predict assaults. BBC News. Retrieved October 7, 2009, from
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8270934.stm.

CPSC 430 – Journal Entry #2a: Multi-tasking

Wii Bowling

Steve Andrews. Polk undercover drug investigators play Wii during raid. Tampa Bay Online. Retrieved September 23, 2009, from http://www2.tbo.com/content/2009/sep/21/undercover-drug-investigators-embarrass-polk-sheri/…….

Less than 8 hours since I posted my last journal entry, I came across this gem. Not only are the criminals good at multi-tasking these days, but even the law enforcement officers as well. They didn’t even bothered to put the remote strap on, just unprofessional.

CPSC 430 – Journal Entry #2: Internet Addiction

Facebook thief

Edward Marshall. “Burglar leaves his Facebook page on victim’s computer.” The Journal. Retrieved September 22, 2009, from http://www.journal-news.net/page/content.detail/id/525232.html.

Due to my summer commitment, I was recently without internet for 2 months. Though the urge to check my email was ever present (as I applied for a co-op job and wanted to check for updates), I never really missed “being out of touch.” And then I hear about a kid who is so addicted in Facebook such that he would take the time to check his account while robbing someone’s house. What is so important that you couldn’t wait 20 more minutes and browse the site at the comfort of your own home, possibly away from law enforcement pursuit? Now, perhaps I just don’t have enough friends, but it only takes me maybe 10 minutes every once in a while to stalk…er…to check out what my closest friends are doing, any more time just leaves me bored and determined to pursue some other procrastinating methods. Now before I start doing my weekly readings, let me check my notification tray for new email and RSS feeds…

CPSC 430 – Journal Entry #1: Dollhouse

Dollhouse

Whedon, J. (2009). Dollhouse. US: Fox Broadcasting Company.

“If I think I can figure things out, is that curiosity or arrogance?” – Topher Brink (3 min clip from “Epitaph One”)

* NOTE: Contains spoiler for the Dollhouse TV show.

The Dollhouse is an underground organization (owned by Rossum Corporation) that employs various individuals as “Actives”, wipe their minds and then program them to do whatever mission is needed at that time. These missions can include sexual encounters, negotiation, friendship, and so on. When the Actives are not “imprinted” with a memory, they spend their time in a calm, spa-like environment and mostly have the intelligence of a child.

When the show first started, similar to Adelle DeWitt (highest ranking official of the L.A. branch Dollhouse), I was able to rationalize the morality behind such an organization. Each Actives signed a contract to work with the Dollhouse for 5 years and at the end of the contract they get paid a large sum of money. Some were recruited as an alternative to spending their life in prison, while others possibly just wanted to escape their past. In general it was a win-win situation for the Actives and the Dollhouse.

It was unclear whether the Dollhouse would honour their contract however, since once you’re wiped, ideally you won’t even remember entering this contract in the first place. Later in the season, it was revealed to the audiences that some Actives were actually forced into this job. Some were also sexually abused (either in the state of imprint or not) by the Dollhouse staff. The ethic became murky in an instance. The Actives may have signed up to do any mission, including those sexual in nature, but to be taken advantage of by staff was another matter. With that trust broken, you can’t pretend to be righteous anymore.

It wasn’t until the last episode of the season “Epitaph One” (not broacasted, only available on Season 1 DVD) that Rossum’s ulterior motive was finally revealed. By imprinting someone else with your own memory, essentially there would be immortality as you can live on in another body once your old body dies. It’s a good question whether you consider this immortality in the first place, but something else is more important. Not only was the contract broken (ie. Active gets to return to their own lives after 5 years), but you can claim that the Actives, even though their body is still alive, living as another mentally, are essentially dead, “murdered”. The problem became even worse as the episode revealed, but I will refrain from disclosing more of the plot in case anyone would like to watch the show.

This “take-over-the-world” plan, unintentially, was hatched due to Topher Brink’s (scientist at L.A. branch) advancement of the imprint technology. In this last episode, Topher, now mentally unstable from his guilt, said “If I think I can figure things out, is that curiosity or arrogance?” Even though scientist have the knowledge to do something, does it mean they should apply them? Specifically, was it wrong to invent nuclear bombs? Should we clone human and other animals? I don’t think technology and invention need to be stifled because we as human beings are innately programmed to be competitive and to survive (sometimes destroy ourselves in the process). If it were, we wouldn’t have cars as transportation due to so many accidents or knives to cut food as it can be used to stab people. Whether to use something for the good of society or for nefarious reasons should ultimately be left to individual decision. The scientists should not be blamed for how other people use their invention. In fact, war and military-funded research have advanced many technology we enjoy today.

Katee Sackhoff

Katee Sackhoff
Full Name: Kathryn Ann Sackhoff
Birth date: April 8, 1980 (29yo)
Height: 5′ 6 1/2″ (169cm)
Eye Color: Hazel
Requested by: Jessie and JN

Why is she featured?
A better question would be, why did it take me so long to write about her? One part is because I don’t think anything I write would do her justice, the other part is of course laziness. I think you should be more worried I knew most of the stuff below without looking them up.

Is she a lesbian?
Good question. It’s one that I’m sure alot of enquiring minds would like to know. She appears to be with her boyfriend Scott at the moment, so most likely no.

What’s her story?
If you’re just going by her filmography, it’s really nothing to be excited about. Katee started off doing Lifetime TV movie, Fifteen and Pregnant, then a relatively unknown TV series, The Education of Max Bickford and later moved on to do crappy movies such as Halloween: Resurrection, White Noise 2, and The Last Sentinel (Awful, bloody film from what I’ve heard). So what’s with all the fascination and admiration? All because of one torture soul in the critically acclaimed Battlestar GalacticaKara “Starbuck” Thrace.

To be honest, I didn’t really like her when I first saw the BSG mini-series, she was too much of a man for me (in later interviews she did admit to base the character on her brother), and at first glance she wasn’t very attractive. However, four episodes and a mesmerizing lip quivering near tears scene later, I was in love. I guess I should thank her injured knee that she decided to quit her Olympic swimming dream and got into acting. After 4 impressive years in BSG, most had hoped David Eick’s (one of BSG’s producers) new show Bionic Woman would be a new home to showcast Sackhoff’s performance. And it did, a little too well I would say. BW’s story was a frakking joke and combined with a weak lead actress, Michelle Ryan, it never stood a chance. If the network ever wish to revive the show though, they should just give the lead to Katee, who all the critics agree was the better Bionic Woman.

Besides her obvious acting chops, Katee’s down to earth personality is what really makes her rise above all other celebrities. Her impulsiveness, potty-mouth, road rage, Harley Davidson motocycle, wine addiction (I kid) just makes you want to fear befriend her. She also has two cute dogs named Meatball and Nelly B (named after Katee’s character in Max Bickford).

What’s her current project?
Still waiting for Lost & Found to be picked up, but currently filming season 8 of 24 as an analyst (boooring! She better be shooting guns and doing field work like Chloe).


— Random Quotes —

Pretty much anything that Katee says in an interview is comedy gold, especially with Cort & Fatboy. I think you should just listen to them all.

On her upbringing: “People are shocked to learn that I grew up in a small town, and I love to be in the dirt. And I love to camp, and I love to fish. I love to gut my own fish”

On her sex scene: “[Jamie Bamber's] wife actually told him not to do his O face, you know, like the oh oh OH face. And I was like, oh my god, what does my O face look like? So I actually practiced in the mirror. What does my O face look like, you never actually see it. It was interesting.”


TeamSpank
IMDB

Katee Sackhoff and a centurionKatee Sackhoff and Bear McCreary

The Snow Walker (2003)

The Snow Walker

First Impression: No idea this exist until we went to Ellen’s house one day.

Afterthoughts: It’s hard to support indie films, when they’re the same cliche tripe produced in Hollywood, except with a crappier budget. I’m sure back in the 50s white people were really as mentally ugly (racist) and retarded (about environment) as portrayed but geez can the pilot be any more clueless about flying and survival? Even without Ellen’s expert opinion, everybody in the room knew you never leave the scene of the crash! And the pilot fought in WWII, so there’s no reason for him to be so stupid throughout the movie just to play on our sympathy for the Inuit. The location was beautiful sure, but if there’s all there is to it I might as well have watched a documentary. Ha, I just checked IMDB and it turns out Michael Buble was in it, and I didn’t even know. Gah, and I was also digging my brains where I’ve seen the pilot’s boss before…he was played by Jack Bauer’s father!

17 Again (2009)

17 Again

First Impression: Well here’s a random review. I’m indifferent towards Zac Efron (didn’t watch High School Musical) and do find him cute but too pretty for his own good. Wait, so why did I watch this? I was reading the Television Without Pity review and they said the B-plot (about Zac’s nerd best friend Ned) was pretty sweet.

Afterthoughts: The main plot was just as I’d imagined, lots of incest jokes and many gratuitous “sexy” Zac Efron scenes, but I expected all of that anyway so let’s just focus on why I really watched the movie…Ned’s seduction of Zac’s principal Jane. I will never be as huge a nerd as Ned, so his quirkiness is hard to relate and somewhat over-the-top, but what a comedic gem it was when Ned finally had his dinner date with Jane, oh man it was so worth suffering the rest of the film. I do have a bone to pick though, and that was using Cat Power’s song “The Greatest” in that cheesy divorce courtroom scene. I learned of the song through a BSG vid with Starbuck and Kat, so I will never be able to associate that song with any romantic notion whatsoever.

Coraline (2009)

Coraline

First Impression: As most of you know, Neil Gaiman is my favourite author and naturally I’ve been waiting for this film since forever. The film premiere weekend coincided with Hailey and Jessie’s birthday, so we decided to watch this after snowshoeing at Cypress.

Afterthoughts: I really wanted to like this film A LOT, but sadly came away a little disappointed. It is inevitable for fans of the book to know exactly what’s going to happen. I didn’t have a problem with Stardust, but with a horror movie such as this, I guess it didn’t work in its favour. It’s nice to see other people in the theatre, such as Ellen, who genuinely got creeped out by the film. I’m also not really a fan of 3D…it worked fine for a little while, but after my eyes got a little tired, the images started to blur. Though it’s probably impossible (or impractical) to do so, I think the movie would be even scarier with real people. One last annoying thing would be Coraline herself. I don’t remember her ever being this insolent, unsympathetic child in the book. I’m not sure if it’s just Dakota Fanning’s interpretation or Henry Selick’s direction. The last time a character “rankled my ass” (borrowed the words from BSG’s Cavil) similiarly would be Ellen Page’s Juno. Flaws aside, the film was visually stunning, with tiny things like the popcorn-pooping chicken and the angel-wings-wearing dog to tickle your fancy.

We went into the theatre about 10min before the screen time and it was pretty much full already, so our group had to sit separately. Which was fine really, because it meant Ellen won’t be able to grab my arms. I did have to question people’s common sense for bringing their crying 2 year old baby into the movie, well any movies for that matter. It’s a scary movie, and I don’t think your 2 year old would understand much anyway.

Nurse.Fighter.Boy (2008)

Nurse.Fighter.Boy

First Impression: The only reason why I went to this particular First Weekend Club screening is because there would be a cast Q&A afterward. I decided to drag Abha into this as well because there was nothing good in the Norm theatre.

Afterthoughts: This was a fairly pointless story that felt more like a showcase for the cast’s talent. The dialogue was riddled with cliches and the plot highly predictable and contrived. I do agree with the 24hrs/Metro reviews that the cast did a great job despite the material they were given. The soundtrack was really good as well, and along with the last Canadian film I saw (Walk All Over Me), it seems Canadian film makers knows their music. We (well not me) got to ask Karen LeBlanc (lead actress) some questions at the end, and she mentioned this is her first feature film, which was a pleasant surprise. She’ll go far in her acting career, if she knows how to choose her films correctly…

Watching the Detectives (2007)

Watching the Detectives

First Impression: At first I was going to settle on “Up the Yangtze” when Ellen was at Rogers, but then Kimmy vehemently opposed to watching documentaries and we settled on this unknown little movie.

Afterthoughts: This movie was a pleasant surprise. If I had looked at the DVD cover or watched the trailer, I would never have rented it. Cillian Murphy to me was always the dude with the creepy eyes, and Lucy well, I just didn’t like her. The romance worked solely because of Cillian’s adorable portrayal of such a gullible yet lovable character. It would’ve been even better to cast someone else as the femme fatale (maybe Charlize Theron??). Lucy’s attempt at (faking) drunkenness just made me want to fast forward the scene. A lot of the frontal and overhead shots were a nice nod as well to the film noir genre…which also sadly reminds me of Veronica Mars (dammit!). The story was pretty simple yet quite effective (Kimmy would disagree) because I think deep down everyone craves an adventure…or ten. I have to change my mind about Cillian too; when he was spotting his shades and rocking out in his backyard he was just drop dead gorgeous…ok maybe it’s because I couldn’t see his eyes in that scene.